COMPLAINT TO IOPC

Sent to IOPC

NN/YP Youth Parliament

Wed 20/03/2019 17:02

I sent this complaint to the wrong email last week so I am resending it.

From: NN/YP Youth Parliament

Sent: 12 March 2019 09:44

To: Complaints Team

Subject: Commander Neil Jerome lied on Oath to IICSA

Dear IOPC,

On 7th March 2019 Commander Neil Jerome lied to the IICSA Inquiry;

CMM NEIL JEROME misled the inquiry about the nature of the role in the National Association of Young People In Care (NAYPIC) of a 2011 convicted frauster Councillor Christopher Fay of London Borough of Greenwich, and the Panorama programme VIP scandals, that I dubbed platform for a crook, stating he 'worked' for NAYPIC and I that Mary Moss was simply his collegue.

Cmm Neil Jerome gave me no status even though I worked in a paid official role of £9,000 plus London weighting as one of two London Development Officers for NAYPIC at the time and was one of a team of ten Nationally.

Cllr Chris Fay had no official role in NAYPIC, as it would be impossible as the organisation was run by and for young people who had been in care who were under 25 (I was employed from 17 years old to 22 years old before I resigned to become later elected at conference to National Chair). It would be like implying that Harvey Proctor was 'working for' the Independent Inquiry into Child Sexual Abuse, just because he is a 'core participant'. It would imply him a status that would be very concerning and very misleading.

It was also not made known that Chris Fay had not seen Mary Moss for over 30 years and that Moss had delivered to Fay a ban officially, in 1991 after taking advice from the London Boroughs Grants

Unit and that he had been furious at her actions at the time so was an out and out dangerous enemy of the organisation of NAYPIC with a vindictive and well connected side to him.

If she had of been given the chance to speak to Government which she petitioned to have and contacted the then Prime Minister, before she was raided and before she put the notes of Fay up, as well

as her own evidence of the Guest Book and Reciept books, on the net for her own and others safety, (again not made clear), she would have spoken very dispharagingly about Cllr Chris Fay as someone who was not to be trusted and with powerful links politically and in media and or worse.

She would have put it as far as to say he was vengeful and dangerous

on ceratin awful levels. Victims only meant money to him as some kind of scandal and to watch out for him as he had another agenda, nothing else.

She noted he never said anything about childrens rights, just salacious scandal.

The most generous interpretation that the Commander could have used of Chris Fay's role would have been, to have made clear, that he was the same as Carol Cazier of Elm Guest House, as a whistle blower, as an informant and an 'advisor' of wrong doing to the organisation NAYPIC as that is what we called them at the time 'advisors' (not Whistleblowers) and we had many of them in all walks of life from Colonel Archie Pagan to Lord Ennals to name but a few.

It was not made clear what his actual job was. His actual job was ommitted as an elected councillor of the London Borough of the London Borough of Greenwich.

The Commander also mislead the Inquiry saying that the 'evidence' that I put on the net that was seized by the police, after obtaining a warrant to enter my home address in 2012, was obtained by Fay in the 1982 Carol Caziers raid. Fay was never at the raid in 1982. He met Carol as he happened to be in the NAYPIC office at some point between 1989 and 1991 I cannot recall what year.

The Commander failed to say the evidence was a court stamped

evidence from the original raid of the Guest House and had been used as evidence to convict the Caziers, instead he associated it with FAY & MOSS as some kind of 'pair' and then used Fay's recent 2011 conviction to deliberately throw doubt about the evidences authenticity saying it was 'dubious' when they had seized it from my house and used it in all there work costing the tax payer millions in legal fees.

The commander stated then that considering Mr Fay's character the evidence that was handed to me only, in my office, at 20 Comton Terrace, N1 in 1989 by Carol Cazier for her forthcoming court case in 3 months, was "dubious'. Yet the same documents seized from me were court stamped official documents taken by police in 2012 from my premises and they would have DNA on them of the people who signed in. Therefore they should have been stated as primary

evidence and returned to me 'the keeper of the information', as they had been given to my organization for the purposes of a court case.

I am a professional childrens rights campaigner and have no crimminal convictions. I consider the actions of the Commander as personally slanderous and misleading on a grand scale in history.

He also stated that the police had interviewed me which was not true.

I point out that I am not on a legal footing equal and never have been in all of this. I am someone who does good in my day to day life, I have set up businesses to fund a youth parliament economy. I feel persecuted by simply wanting to work to stop child abuse. I believe that I have been under survellience by Operation Pico Rivera and that if I am not targeted I might just get to do my job.

It is suggested, or implied by the Commander that I and Fay where the source 'together' of MP Tom Watson's information from Journalist, again that cannot possibly be true as I haven't seen Fay since 1991.

I am now open to being the next Marietta Higgs in the Cleveland inquiry and have been convicted by flase association by the commander with a crook who robbed pensioners in an Olympic property fraud case for which he served 1 year for money laundering.

I don't know Fay and when I met him I thought he was suspicious.

Regards

Mary Moss